The Hasan Hadeeth: Its definition and usage with the Scholars of Hadeeth

By_

The Hasan Hadeeth: 

Definition: A report that fulfils the conditions of a Saheeh hadeeth except that one of its narrators or some of them are lesser than their counterparts in a Saheeh hadeeth in terms of precision (الضبط) yet that does not remove it from being used as an evidence in terms of its authenticity. And it is referred to as Hasan li-dhaatihi (الحسن لذاته).
More explanation of the terms: 

So it meets the conditions of Saheeh hadeeth in terms of:

  1. Its chain of narration (isnaad) leads back to the Prophet (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam). The chain of narration is connected all the way back to the Prophet (salallaahu`alaihi wassallam).
  2. The narrators are trustworthy.
  3. It is free from contradicting any narrations stronger than it.
  4. It is free from subtle or hidden defects.

What remains therefore is the condition of precision (ضبط) – and this is the distinguishing feature of this category. So the narrator in a hadeeth hasan is lesser in terms of precision than a narrator in a hadeeth saheeh. And this hadeeth is known by various terms applied to its narrators, such as:

  • Sudooq (truthful)
  • Laa b’as bihi (no problem with him)
  • Laysa bihi ba’s (with him there is no problem)
  • Thiqatun yukhti (reliable but makes mistakes)
  • Sudooq lahu awhaam (truthful but has errors)

Example: Ibn Qattaan in his Ziyaadah `ala Sunan Ibn Maajah (2744) from the route of Yahyaa Ibn Sa`eed from (عن) Amr Ibn Shu`ayb from his father from his grandfather that Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) said: “It is disbelief for a man to attribute himself to someone other than his father knowingly or to deny his connection to his father, even subtly.” Its isnaad is hasan.

In the chain of narration there is `Amr Ibn Shu`ayb Ibn Muhammad Ibn `Abdillaah Ibn `Amr Ibn al-`Aas. Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr said about him in at-Taqreeb (2/72): Sudooq. Due to this the hadeeth is rendered Hasan. 

Ibn Hajr stated in Nukhbatul-Fikr fee Mustalahi Ahlil-Athar with its explanation by the same author in Nuzhatun-Nadhr (p.29): “The aahaad narration transmitted by a reliable narrator, complete in precision, with a connected chain of narration, without hidden defects and without being contradictory, then that is a hadeeth saheeh li-dhaatihi (authentic in its own right) but if the precision [of a narrator in the chain] is lacking then it is hasan li-dhaatihi.”

When we define a hasan hadeeth, we do so assuming that it is hasan li-dhaatihi because that is was is intended by a hasan hadeeth. As for a hadeeth that is referred to as hasan li-ghayrihi then that is a weak hadeeth in its origin but it is raised to the level of hasan due to the gathering together of a number of routes of transmission.

Ruling of the Hadeeth Hasan: 

Its ruling is the same as the hadeeth saheeh in evidence even if it is lesser than saheeh in strength [as far as the isnaad is concerned]. For this reason it is considered as a proof with the scholars, and they act upon it – likewise the vast majority of the hadeeth scholars consider it to be a proof, except a few in opposition from the harsh ones. And there were some who were too lenient and considered the hasan to be saheeh.

Example of a hadeeth hasan:

Imaam at-Tirmidhee said: Qutaibah narrated to us that Ja`far Ibn Sulaimaan ad-Duba`ee narrated to us from Abu `Imraan al-Jawnee from Abu Bakr Ibn Abee Moosaa al-Ash`aree who said: I heard my father whilst he was in the presence of the enemy say: Allaah’s Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassalam) said: ((إِنَّ أَبْوَابَ الْجَنَّةِ تَحْتَ ظِلاَلِ السُّيُوفِ)) “Indeed the gates of Paradise are beneath the shade of swords.” Imaam at-Tirmidhee said regarding this hadeeth: It is hasan ghareeb. It is ruled as hasan because the four narrators are reliable (thiqaat) except Ja`far Ibn Sulaimaan ad-Duba`ee who is hasan in hadeeth (as cited by Ibn Hajr in Tahdheeb at-Tahdheeb 2/96), so the hadeeth drops from saheeh to hasan.

The saying of the scholars: “This hadeeth has a saheeh isnaad” or “it has a hasan isnaad”:
  1. The saying of the muhadditheen: “This hadeeth has a saheeh isnaad” rather than their saying: “This hadeeth is saheeh.”
  2. Likewise their saying: “This hadeeth has a hasan isnaad” rather than their saying: “This hadeeth is hasan.”

This is because a hadeeth may have a saheeh isnaad or a hasan isnaad but not so the text (matn) of the hadeeth due to it contradicting what is stronger or it having a hidden defect. So it is as if the muhaddith when he says: “This hadeeth is saheeh” he is taking on the responsibility for us that the hadeeth has met all the five conditions of authenticity. However, if he says: “This hadeeth has a saheeh isnaad” then he is taking on the responsibility for us that the hadeeth has met three of the conditions, those being: a connected chain of narration, reliability of the narrators, and their precision. As for the absence of contradicting other stronger narrations, or the absence of hidden defects, then he does not take on that responsibility because it is not established/verified with him. However if a trusted and relied upon scholar of hadeeth limits himself to saying, “This hadeeth has a saheeh isnaad” and there is no mention of any hidden defect, then it is taken as being saheeh in text also because the origin is the absence of hidden defects and contradictions.

The meaning of the statement of at-Tirmidhee and others, “Hadeeth Hasan Saheeh.”

This term seems problematic at first glance because a hasan hadeeth falls short of being saheeh. So how does one gather between the two terms when it is known that they are of different degrees? The scholars have explained the intent of Tirmidhee in his usage of this terminology with several explanations. The best of those sayings is that which is mentioned by Al-Haafidh Ibn Hajr and As-Suyootee agreed with it, and is summarised as follows:

  1. If the hadeeth has two chains of narration or more, then the meaning is: It is hasan in a chain, and saheeh in another chain.
  2. If there is only one chain of narration, then the meaning is: It is hasan with one group of scholars, and saheeh with another group of scholars.

So it is as if the author is pointing towards the fact that there is differing amongst the scholars in the ruling upon this hadeeth, or that he is undecided between which which ruling it most deserves.

Categorisation of Al-Baghawee of the hadeeth in “Al-Masaabeeh“:

Imaam Al-Baghawee used his own specific terminology in this work of his. He refers to any hadeeth in Bukhaaree or Muslim as saheeh; whilst any hadeeth in the four Sunan he refers to as hasan. This terminology is not in agreement with that which is utilised by the general body of the muhadditheen. This is because in the four Sunan there are hadeeth that are saheeh, hasan, da`eef and munkar. For this reason Ibnus-Salaah and An-Nawawee made mention of this matter.

The full name of the book is Masaabeeh as-Sunnah – the author gathered in it hadeeth taken from the two Saheehs, the four Sunan and the Sunan of ad-Daarimee. Al-Khateeb At-Tabreezee (d. 741) increased upon it and refined it, and re-classified many of the hadeeth and named it Mishkaat Al-Masaabeeh. It has between 4,500 and 5,945 ahadeeth.

At-Tirmidhee and the Hadeeth Hasan:

The Jaami` of At-Tirmidhee (well known as Sunan at-Tirmidhee) is the origin of the usage of hasan – and he is the one who popularised this term in his book by using it plentifully.

www.atowar-rahman-salafi.blogspot.com

Comments

Post a Comment

|| Popular Posts ||

রাসূলুল্লাহ (ছাঃ)-এর ছালাত বনাম প্রচলিত ছালাত **-আব্দুর রাযযাক বিন ইউসুফ (পর্ব-২৫)

By_
  **-আব্দুর রাযযাক বিন ইউসুফ (পর্ব-২৫) সালাম ফিরানোর পর সাথে সাথে উঠা যাবে না : সালাম ফিরানোর পরপরই তাড়াহুড়া করে উঠে যাওয়া খারাপ অভ্যাস। এ খারাপ অভ্যাসকে ছাহাবীগণ কঠোরভাবে দমন করেছেন। আব্দুল্লাহ ইবনে রাবাহ (রাঃ) নবী করীম (ছাঃ)-এর ছাহাবীগণের একজন হতে বর্ণনা করেন, রাসূল (ছাঃ) আছরের ছালাত আদায় করেন। সালাম ফিরানোর সাথে সাথে একজন লোক দাঁড়িয়ে যান। ওমর (রাঃ) তাকে দেখতে পান এবং ঘাড় ধরে বলেন, বসে যান। নিশ্চয় পূর্বের লোকেরা ধ্বংস হয়েছে একারণে যে, তারা দুই ছালাতের মাঝে বিরতি দিত না। রাসূল (ছাঃ) তখন ওমর (রাঃ)-কে বললেন, ‘তুমি ঠিক করেছো’। [1]  এ হাদীছ প্রমাণ করে, দুই ছালাতের মাঝে বিরতি হতে হবে এবং তাসবীহ, তাহলীল ও যিকিরের মাধ্যমে কিছু সময় অতিবাহিত করতে হবে, তারপর অন্য ছালাত আদায় করতে হবে। সালাম ফিরানোর পর মাথায় হাত রেখে দু‘আ পড়া যাবে না : সালাম ফিরানোর পর মাথায় হাত রেখে দু‘আ পড়ার প্রমাণে কোন ছহীহ হাদীছ নেই। এ আমল পরিহার করতে হবে। আনাস (রাঃ) বলেন, রাসূল (ছাঃ) যখন ছালাত আদায় করতেন, তখন ডান হাত তার মাথায় রাখতেন এবং বলতেন, ‘আল্লাহর নামে শুরু করছি যিনি ছাড়া কোন মা‘বূদ নেই, যিনি পরম করুণাময়, দয়াল...
Read More >>

Fatwa বিবাহ ও তালাক

By_
  প্রশ্ন (৩৫/৪৩৫) : ওলী ছাড়াই এক মেয়ের বিবাহ হয়েছে। বিবাহের এক মাস পর মেয়ের অভিভাবক মৌখিক সম্মতি প্রদান করেন। পরবর্তীতে ছেলে তিনবারে মেয়েকে তিন তালাক প্রদান করেছে। এক্ষণে প্রশ্ন হল, ওলী ব্যতীত বিবাহ বৈধ হয়েছে কি? বিবাহ শুদ্ধ করার জন্য অভিভাবকের মৌন বা মৌখিক সম্মতিই কি যথেষ্ট? নাকি পুনরায় ঈজাব-কবুল আবশ্যক? উক্ত তালাক কি কার্যকর হয়েছে? মেয়েকে পুনরায় বিবাহের মাধ্যমে গ্রহণ করা যাবে কি?  উত্তর : উক্ত বিবাহ সিদ্ধ হয়নি। কারণ রাসূলুল্লাহ (ছাঃ) বলেছেন, যে নারী অভিভাবক ছাড়া বিয়ে করল তার বিয়ে বাতিল, বাতিল, বাতিল (তিরমিযী হা/১১০২; আবুদাঊদ হা/২০৮৩; মিশকাত হা/৩১৩১)। যেখানে বিয়েই হয়নি সেখানে মৌখিক বা লিখিত সম্মতিতে বৈধতার কোন প্রশ্নই আসে না। অতএব অভিভাবক কর্তৃক সম্মতি দানের পর পুনরায় সুন্নাতী তরীকার নতুন করে বিয়ে করাতে হ’ত। কিন্তু সেটাও করা হয়নি। তাই ছেলে কর্তৃক তালাক দেয়া অর্থহীন। কারণ তাদের বিয়েই হয়নি। তারা ব্যভিচারী। এমতাবস্থায় প্রথমতঃ তাদের কৃতকর্মের জন্য তওবা করতে হবে (যেহেতু ইসলামী শরী‘আতের শাস্তির বিধান আমাদের সমাজে নেই)। দ্বিতীয়তঃ অভিভাবকের সম্মতিতে পুনরায় বিয়ে করতে পারে। কারণ রাসূলু...
Read More >>

Bilqis(Queen of Sheba): Tafseer of Ibn katheer : Qur'anic Story

By_
Image
Bilqis(Queen of Sheba) Allah the Almighty says: {He inspected the birds, and said: "What is the matter that I see not the hoopoe? Or is he among the absentees? "I will surely punish him with a severe torment, or slaughter him, unless he brings me a clear reason." But the hoopoe stayed not long: he (came up and) said: "I have grasped (the knowledge of a thing) which you have not grasped and I have come to you from Saba' (Sheba) with true news." "I found a woman ruling over them: she has been given all things that could be possessed by any ruler of the earth, and she has a great throne. I found her and her people worshipping the sun instead of Allah, and Shaitan (Satan) has made their deeds fair-seeming to them, and has barred them from (Allah's) Way: so they have no guidance." [As Shaitan (Satan) has barred them from Allah's Way] so they do not worship (prostrate themselves before) Allah, Who brings to light what is hidden in th...
Read More >>

Moving the finger during Tashahhud _ Important Masala-Masael,

By_
Image
Firstly:  It is proven that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to point with his index finger and move it during the tashahhud when praying.  The scholars differed concerning that and there are several points of view.  1 – The Hanafis say that the finger should be raised when saying “Laa (no)” in the phrase “Ash-hadu an laa ilaaha ill-Allaah (I bear witness that there is no god except Allaah)” and it should be lowered when saying, “ill-Allaah (except Allaah).”   2 – The Shaafa’is say that it should be raised when saying “ill-Allaah.”  3 – The Maalikis say that it should be moved right and left until one finishes the prayer.  4 – The Hanbalis say that one should point with the finger when saying the name of Allaah, without moving it.  Shaykh al-Albaani (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: There is no basis for any of these definitions and manners in the Sunnah. The closest of them to the correct view is the Hanbali view, were i...
Read More >>